跳到主要內容

types of infrared filters

 

The CMOS sensors in our cameras naturally have a larger range than this, from about 300nm through 1000nm. That’s twice the range of human vision! To make our images look normal, manufacturers put filters in front of the sensors that limit the camera to only the spectrum that we can see.

 

Infrared photography takes things in a less realistic but fascinating direction: what if you shoot beyond what we can see, into deeper wavelengths of light? There are a number of infrared filters available that you can convert your camera to, by replacing the sensor filters than let through a different portion of the light spectrum. The images in this exactly were taken with a Lumix GX85 that I had converted to full-spectrum photography which allows for the use of screw-in filters on the front of a lens to choose the desired spectrum. Common options are as follows:

 

590nm (also called Super Colour):

Very colourful but hard to use the full amount of colour, since most of the time it becomes a wash of blue. It’s important to note that this wavelength cut-off includes a sizeable portion of the visible spectrum including orange and red. Because of this, the high-contrast details often found in skies and foliage are more muted.

 

665nm (Also called Enhanced Colour):

Adding the reds of the visible spectrum into the full infrared mix, this can add additional colour if you’re in a heavily urban area. With careful massaging, you can increase the contrast and have more vibrant colours, but a lot of post-processing work is required if you want to get the right colours.

 

720nm (also called Standard):

This is my personal favourite. Pure infrared light with glowing foliage, darker skies, contrasty clouds and deeper water. You can still play with false colour here at 720nm even without visible spectrum, since the RGB photosite colour dyes on the camera sensor don’t equally become transparent to IR light until about 820nm. This allows for a conversion to blue skies and a slight hint of colour in the trees if you want it. If you want to make it black & white, you’ll immediately already have good infrared contrast without any extra efforts.

 

850nm (also called Deep B&W):

Deeper into the infrared spectrum, there is no colour information to be found. Usually higher contrast and the easiest to deal with in editing since there is no colour to fuss with (processing for false colour is a can of worms).

 

1000nm:

Infrared filters are available down to 1000nm, but since the camera loses sensitivity to light around this point, you’ll need very long exposures (effectively making it function like an infrared ND filter). The contrast is roughly the same as 850nm but you can see a bit farther into scenes without any haze building up. Very few people consider these filters more than a novelty for very niche scenarios (long exposure IR).

 
Remember that any infrared filter with a number less than 700nm will include a portion of the visible spectrum, limiting the IR contrast effects in favour of added colour that is often times not needed. Beyond 820nm, no colour information exists so 850nm filters are primarily monochrome. Dyes used by different manufacturers may behave differently, but this is the standard behaviour. My favourite wavelength continues to be 720nm for its combination of high-contrast and the ability to process for false colour. There’s a reason why it’s considered the “standard”, which is not with “basic” vs. some other “premium” option!

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Scythians 斯泰基 塞種 西古提人

900 BC - 200 AD British museum   Tomb of scythe prince, Buktarma valley, 1200 masl, Google map Herodotus   絲路上的帝國 Biblegeography   哥羅西書 3:11  在此並不分希利尼人、猶太人、受割禮的、未受割禮的、化外人、 西古提人 、為奴的、自主的.惟有基督是包括一切、又住在各人之內。 塞種 塞迦  saka 史記漢書 西域傳: 塞種  ctext 昔匈奴破大月氏,大月氏西君大夏,而塞王南君罽賓。塞種分散,往往為數國。自疏勒以西北,休循、捐毒之屬,皆故 塞種 也。 匈奴列傳 Ctext :塞王 《史記》在《大宛列傳》與《匈奴列傳》中, 詳細 記錄了中亞至天山一帶的塞種(塞王、塞地)狀況。例如,文中記載了月氏西破走塞王,導致塞人南遷越過懸度(今帕米爾高原及克什米爾一帶) Baike Genetic history   Genetics  Nih griffin  ? Scytho-Siberian  world 塞迦 saka  wiki Disappeared? Sarmatians ( 薩爾馬泰 , 奄蔡 史記 ,  Aorsi )and goths YouTube  

calculate pH of phosphoric acid

Question: adding 1/4 teaspoon of 10% phosphoric acid  to 19 litres of water, what will be the pH? Let's go through the calculations step by step. Step 1. Convert mass ( or volume) of 10% phosphoric acid to mole per litre ( mol/L) The above calculation shows that 1/4 tsp of H3PO4 acid is 6.97e-5 mol/L Step 2. Input this value to BATE (or other app) to calculate pH The answer: pH = 4.16, ie too acidic !? If you use pipette instead of teaspoon,  1 drop = 0.05ml. So 1/4 TSP means roughly 25 drops If you actually aim for pH 5.6 (which is optimum pH for mashing), conc will be 2.51 e-6, or 1/100 tsp , 0.044 ml, roughly 1 drop Let's roll back a bit. From  recipes of   BarleyWine , summer rye , hefe Gordon Strong suggested to use 1/4 teaspoon of 10% phosphoric acid, which is targeting pH of 5.5..... Discussion on  homebrewtalk  forum. However using online BF water calc , Sparge pH would be 4.6. but he also added 1 tsp of CaCl2. 2H20. Mash pH change from 5.7 t...

ES8311 and ES8388 codec IC

ES8388 audio codec module is one of the audio codec modules available that is supported by ESP32 and official ESP-ADF releases. The ES8388 module lets you have: Stereo microphone and line input Stereo headphone and line out Up to 96 kHz 24 bpp high quality audio This module is compatible with all MCUs that have I2C and I2S ports (like ESP32, ESP8266, STM32, i.MX6, Raspberry Pi, etc) ES8311 Maxgerhardt github PCBartist twblogs ESP32-A1S  (limited stock)Audio codec AC101 or ES8388 built-in. NB the pinouts and firmware are different! Arduino - ESP31-A1S instructable Phil Schatzmann and his github   Simple A2DP thaaraak github on ESP32-A1S github of Yveaux and  Marcel-licence ESP ADF   example:  Logitech PiCorePlayer squeeze lite squeezebox forum   ESP32-Audio-kit  (from AI thinker) based on ESP32-A1S, is simple and small. But upgrade-ability seems limited  Alex John Talbert mixer equalizer: can this be used as simple equalizer? how about proces...