跳到主要內容

confusing espresso brew ratio: 1:1 shot, 1:2 shot and a 1:3 shot

first of all the brew ratio is not same brewing ratio in SCAA

from SCAA :

The ratio of coffee grounds (mass) to water (volume): how much coffee is used for a given quantity of water. This may be expressed in units of either grams per litre

this is mainly used for unpressurised brewing, eg drip, pourover or french press brewing.

This can be simply called as coffee-to-water ratio

it is recommended to be 55 g /L +/- 10%.

    The brew ratio ( or simply ratio of coffee grounds (mass) to water (volume)): how much coffee is used for a given quantity of water. This may be expressed in units of either grams per litre or ounces per US half gallon.

These are related as follows:

    Strength = Brew ratio × Extraction

which can be analyzed as the following identity:

    dissolved solids/water = grounds/water × dissolved solids/grounds

So Brew ratio = Strength / Extraction
or                    = (dissolved solids/water) / (dissolved solids/grounds)

if you have TDS meter, brew ratio
                       = measured TDS / Extraction




somewhere on internet, some simplified it to be used in espresso making:

1:1 shot as ristretto
1:2 shot as normal espresso
1:3 shot as lungo

This causes trouble.

without considering the grind setting, yield extraction, you can make a very weak ( or very strong ) drink with same 1:1 shot.

From Scott Rao:

One of the stickier trends in the past couple of years has been the near-religious adherence, at least in the US, to the 2:1 espresso-brewing ratio.  I’d like to discuss what an espresso-brewing ratio (EBR) is, why it’s relevant, and why it’s a little silly for so many cafes to latch on to this suspiciously harmonious ratio.

What is an Espresso-Brewing Ratio?


Simply put, it’s the ratio of an espresso’s beverage weight to the weight of the dry grounds used to make the shot.  For example, if a barista pulls a 36g shot from 18g of grounds , the ratio would be 2:1. 

Why EBR is relevant

I suspect most baristas do not realize this: if you have exact targets for extraction % and TDS, there is only one EBR that can produce a shot that achieves both targets. For example, let’s say you desire a 20% extraction and 10% TDS.

Using a slightly simplified calculation, the only EBR that can produce a 20% extraction/10% TDS shot is a 2:1 ratio. 

For example, with a 20g dose and 40g shot:

10% TDS = 4g of coffee solids (10% x 40g shot = 4g)
4g of coffee solids extracted from a 20g dose = 20% extraction

A 2:1 EBR can yield a spectrum of extraction/TDS combinations; for example
8% TDS / 16% extraction or
9% TDS / 18% extraction

But no other EBR can produce any of the combinations mentioned above.

It's a combination of:


dose

yield extraction ( grind size)
time (or flow rate )
brew temperature


From Jim Schulman's Espresso 101 , (red arrow is what you want to achieve):


Espresso Compass from Matt Perger:



fivesenses

SCAA protocol

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

CMOS sensor trends and astrophotography, from amateur astronomers perspective

Nowadays, even in low light conditions, digital camera can quality pictures with higher ISO, noise and hot pixels have been gradually reduced. Sony has introduced back illumination process for consumer market. Sony BSI sensors evolved  from Exmor to now Exmor RS( stacked) technology. This stacked technology allows further chip size reduction, which has strong demands in smartphone camera market. Digital astrophotography is also benefited from such advances, utilising Back Side Illumination technology Exmor: Within the CMOS sensor, it outputs low-noise digital signals by "on-chip column AD conversion" and "dual noise reduction" to suppress noise in the first half of the process In low light conditions, when a wide aperture is desirable to collect as much light as possible. At apertures wider than f/2.0, back-illuminated Exmor R sensors are significantly more efficient at collecting light than conventional, front-illuminated sensor...

ultrafast rendezvous to ISS

    14 Oct 2020,  being the first to use a new “ultrafast” rendezvous” scheme with the ISS. Following a flawless ascent to the correct orbit, Soyuz 2 .1a , Soyuz MS-17 caught up with the orbiting laboratory in only two orbits (three hours), halving the time it takes for crew to get to the Station.   The three space travelers of the Soyuz MS-17 mission launched on a six-month mission the International Space Station.  previous 3/4 orbit rendezvous: Soyuz MS-16 4 orbit rendezvous A three-orbit profile was deemed possible without major flight design changes after inauguration of the Soyuz 2-1A rocket that provides a much higher orbit injection accuracy than its predecessors and would allow the two correction maneuvers on Orbit #2 to be eliminated while the Automated Rendezvous Phase would still remain untouched. The deletion of the Orbit #2 maneuvers was expected to slightly tighten the already restrictive phase angle window from and upper limit of 30-35° to 25-28°...

Scythians 斯泰基 塞種 西古提人

900 BC - 200 AD British museum   Tomb of scythe prince, Buktarma valley, 1200 masl, Google map Herodotus   絲路上的帝國 Biblegeography   哥羅西書 3:11  在此並不分希利尼人、猶太人、受割禮的、未受割禮的、化外人、 西古提人 、為奴的、自主的.惟有基督是包括一切、又住在各人之內。 塞種 塞迦  saka 史記漢書 西域傳: 塞種  ctext 昔匈奴破大月氏,大月氏西君大夏,而塞王南君罽賓。塞種分散,往往為數國。自疏勒以西北,休循、捐毒之屬,皆故 塞種 也。 匈奴列傳 Ctext :塞王 《史記》在《大宛列傳》與《匈奴列傳》中, 詳細 記錄了中亞至天山一帶的塞種(塞王、塞地)狀況。例如,文中記載了月氏西破走塞王,導致塞人南遷越過懸度(今帕米爾高原及克什米爾一帶) Baike Genetic history   Genetics  Nih griffin  ? Scytho-Siberian  world 塞迦 saka  wiki Disappeared? Sarmatians ( 薩爾馬泰 , 奄蔡 史記 ,  Aorsi )and goths YouTube