跳到主要內容

紅圈L鏡, 一眼看穿? canon 85 mm lenses

from dcfever in 2018

set 1:


 

need to compare side by side the photos at 100%. Then compare the vertical and horizontal lines.

after comparing 5 different areas front and behind the subject, B has largest blur, so B is f/1.2. 

better to compare by gaussian blur spread, than just by blurriness

set 6:

85mm /1.4 has 9 blades, and f/1.8 and f/1.2 has 8 blades.

Clearly A is f/1.4

As the photos are not taken with max aperture, you cannot determine by size of bokeh ball. So you can only differentiate by rectilinear distortion, barrel / pincushion.

By subtracting B and C photo,

however the the picture are not taken in same direction, horizontal is shifted by 30 pixels, vertical by 38 pixels 



B has larger rectilinear distortion(barrel), is it's f/1.8. Also, the lower right bokeh is more like a ellipse eye than a circle, so definitely B is f/1.8.

C is f/1.2L

set 7:

by zooming in to 100%, B has highest sharpness/resolution: so B is f/1.2


for set 2,3,4,5, the photos are not taken at their widest apertures, but same f/2.8. So you cannot reliably judge by blur or bokeh. The differences can be due to (slight) optical design parameters.

You may find some hints by rectilinear distortion. Actually I found f/1.4 has quite nice bokehs when aperture is set at f/2.8

 

Overall, f/1.4 and f/1.8 are very similar in bokeh and blurs. But:

you get more rounded bokeh from f/1.4

from f/1.8 lens, the bokeh near edges are more "cat eyes"

you get higher resolution ( at infinity) from f/1.2

This quiz is a bit tricky, and only 2 questions (set 1, 2) are comparing under their widest apertures, which would show up the biggest characters (bokehs and blurs).

dofsimulator

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

越南香草

Ngo ~ "N-gaw" Mui ~ "Moo-ee" Ngo ~ "N-gaw" Mui ~ "Moo-ee" Ngo ~ "N-gaw" Mui ~ "Moo-ee" Ngo (N-gaw) ,  Mui  (Moo-ee )  Cilantro Ngo Gai (N-gaw guy), Mui Tau (Moo-ee Tao), Ngo Tau (N-gaw Tao)   Mexican Coriander,  Sawtooth Coriander, Culantro    娥女帝(拼音), 刺芹   特徵:娥女帝是短株形的植物,氣味清淡,葉邊呈鋸齒形,十分容易辨認。來源地:越南。 功效:和白夏差不多,娥女帝亦有祛濕、解毒及驅風的療效。建議食法: Pho,  (Bánh Xeò) 越南煎餅, 炒菜,湯,咖哩 Ngo Gai ~ "N-gaw guy" Mui Tau ~ "Moo-ee Tao" Ngo Tau ~ "N-gaw Tao" - See more at: http://vietworldkitchen.typepad.com/blog/vietnamese-herb-primer.html#sthash.I9rzkzwI.dpuf Rau Ram (Rau Rahm) Vietnam Coriander, Laksa Leaf, "Vietnamese mint(actually not a mint)" Peppery, quite spicy. In salad Hung (Hoong), , Hung Lang (Hoong Lang) Spearmint.  Vietnamese coriander Hung Lui (Hoong Lou-ee), Hung Diu(Hoong Zee-ew) round mint used in salad Hung Cay (Hoong Kay) Mint Rau Que, Hung Que (H

copycat comandante C40 grinder

 from facebook 尋日朋友話係強國網上買左支C40,重要係斑馬木,話要拎嚟同我炫耀下,咁咪拎過嚟我到開箱囉。   斑馬木都停產左好耐,重要買到全新,重要係強國網,佢話買左二千四人仔,我當然半信半疑,見到面拎上手都好重手下,紙盒都算幾真,都幾結實,印刷都唔覺有太大問題,打開盒先開始覺得唔對路(圖1-14開箱圖)。 -1號圖,招紙貼得有d皺,但印刷都算幾清晰。 -2、3號圖,打開就爛左。 -4、5號圖,玻璃樽色澤、材質明顯有問題。 -7同9號係片,一定要聽下啲聲,好怪。 -8號圖,可以睇到冚蓋後,好大條罅。 -10號圖睇到,9號條片扭左幾下,不停有碎跌出黎。 -11號圖,拎出黎就花曬。 -12、13號圖,本身印刷品質數都高,但對番正版個張唔會有黑色油墨跡。 -14號圖,主體Logo係焫落去,有凹凸感,之後用正版對比,先發現問題。  立刻拎支正版出黎比對下。 -15-19號圖,如果無正版盒係手,就咁拎住個假盒都可能呃到下人,但真盒一拎上手,非常硬正,敲落去感覺好唔同。     -20-25號圖,基本重量無太大分別,假貨手柄比較重,正版高度比較多一點點。 -26-30號圖,透明、茶色粉杯一比之下就睇得出分別,正版比較通透、清晰,玻璃瓶品質高。 -31-33號圖,手柄膠片位有花、有明顯水口位,正版無水口,好平滑,木柄和連接轉軸位置都有所不同。 -34號片,正版磁力強,手柄好穩陣,假貨倒轉就跌出嚟,連磁石都甩埋(35號圖)。 -36-37號圖,歸零後正版手柄會卡住,假貨由於磁石位置甩咗,所以鎖唔住。 -38-39號圖,塑膠位置標誌以及文字正版都比較突顯、清晰。 -40號圖,未用內膽就有多處刮花。 -41-44號圖,驟眼睇真係好似,螺絲都跟都幾足,但網上搵左好多圖睇過,基本上文字同刀邊都會有距離,假野比較貼。 -45號圖,刀頭格數卡位用嘅孔,開箱個時扭左幾下已經有碎屑跌出嚟,放大睇更明顯睇到分別,正版手工好好,假野好似月球坑咁。 -46-47號圖,46正版歸零後好平,47扭到好盡,歸零唔順暢,有少許凸起。   -48號片,調節格數聲音,都唔洗講,一聽就知大問題 -49-50號圖,假貨膠料位置明顯水口,螺絲也有分別。 -51-52號圖,正版刀頭用左成年都好新,假貨扭左半日都無,就刮左個圈出黎蝕曬,鋼水差。   -53-56號圖,木面Logo雖然都做到好真,但都搵到分別

劣質洗衣機入水喉

上面白色是最易找到,$2x. 但漏水. 灰色, $4x, 是假冒 "MADE IN ITALY"  假冒 "MADE IN ITALY"  的標緻  左面是白色膠喉的喉頭, 右面是灰色膠喉的喉頭, 上圖左面是真正 好貨 ( MADE IN ITALY )灰色膠蓋.右面是冒牌 白色膠蓋. 膠蓋在安裝扭緊時爆開  上圖左面是真正 好貨 , 標了其他規格.右面是冒牌, 單單印了 MADE IN ITALY  好貨的膠蓋是可以下移, 露出喉頭及黑色軟膠墊 黑色軟膠墊是有坑紋. 質感較柔軟. 緊後可以"迫實"水龍頭 及喉蓋, 沒有滲漏 正板 MADE IN ITALY 賣 $4x, 價錢絕對合理. 冒牌貨在旺角新填地街買的, 也是$4x. 真是要小心!!! NB: MADE IN ITALY 是否真正 意大利制造實在無從考 証