跳到主要內容

Luna-25 soft landing

mission profile:




soft landing is one of main objectives of luna-25


 

DISD-LR ДИСД-ЛР

The soft landing of the station should be provided by a Doppler speed and range meter (DISD-LR) developed by the Vega Concern (part of the Rostec State Corporation's Roselectronics holding). The DISD-LR device is being created in the conditions of import substitution, the developers note.

According to the original plan, Luna 25 was supposed to be launched in 2014. However, various reasons provoked delays one after another. The last big postponement (from 2021 to 2023) was caused by the malfunction detected (80% accuracy in readings) in the Doppler speed and range meter (DISD-LR) during the tests. Being an important part of the soft landing system, this device couldn’t be ignored, and its insufficient accuracy may cost a mission. The repeated tests of DISD-LR and subsequent changes of the lander’s software caused a delay for almost two years



 

 






22 x 13x 2Slotted waveguide antenna array,slot length 20mm est.(2.4 GHz?). Slot array, matlab, slideplayer

Moon dust: the 

The Apollo 15 crew noted that landing radar outputs were affected at an altitude of about 30 ft by moving dust and debris. The dust coated the television camera lens and produced a halo in photographs. In the Apollo 12 mission, the landing velocity trackers gave false readings when they locked onto moving dust and debris during descent. All the Apollo landings were manually done to avoid wrong manoeuvres due to faulty readings. In the Apollo 16 mission, dust coated the lunar rover battery mirrors and overheated it.

ESA PILOT

Before the Ukraine invasion, ESA contribution with a optical navigation camera, aka PILOT-D. But this and other ESA cooperation was pulled off.

Planned pre-landind burn: 11:10 UTC Aug 19 , 2023( 14:10 Moscow time)

Crash:

At 09:47 Moscow Time ( 1 min after moonrise in Crimea) on Aug. 20, 2023, Roskosmos announced that the communications with the spacecraft were interrupted at 14:57 Moscow Time on August 19(moon altitude is 35.64 degree in moscow, 46.47 degree in crimea), during the orbit correction. According to the State Corporation, all attempts to communicate with spacecraft attempted on August 19 and 20 failed. The preliminary analysis showed that the spacecraft entered into an unplanned orbit and crashed into the surface of the Moon, the State Corporation said.

It had lost contact with the spacecraft 47 minutes after the start of the engine firing ( so at least Luna 25 has been transmitting during this period)

According to Roskosmos a special inter-agency commission was being formed to investigate the cause of the failure.

The main cause is the engine burned for 127 seconds instead of planned 84 seconds. 

23 Aug

Trajectory simulated that the spacecraft fell into the 42-kilometer Pontecoulant G crater in the southern hemisphere 60.1 E 57.2S

31 Aug

Update from LRO: 61.360E 57.865S

 about 400 kilometers short of Luna 25’s intended landing point at 69.545 degrees south, 43.544 degrees east.

16 Sep

TASS revealed that accelerometer was not turned on in last moments

But why? Wrong thrust /valve command setting? All the previous TCMs seemed to be spot on. What such simple mistake happened in such final critical phase?

Why didn't Roscosmos abort the engine burn?

Communication blackout?

Luna 25 was well within the communication zone during this de orbit burn, so saying it was in the "blackout zone" is invalid (所謂測控弧段限制). 

Moon set was 21:09 moscow time, ie 6 hours after the de-orbit burn

Oct 2023:

The investigation into the failure found that the neither the accelerometer or its back up transmitted the necessary data required to turn off the engine.

 Specifically, there was abnormal communication between the on-board control system and the accelerometers integrated in the BIUS-L device (angular velocity measurement unit). 

Nominally during this manoeuvre, after the impulse begins, the accelerometers should measure the velocity of the spacecraft and give a signal to the control system when it reaches the programmed parameters. Then, the lander’s control system gives the engines a command to stop working. 

However, the control system was overwhelmed with messages from other systems which were given higher priority (Seradata comment: a likely design error) and the accelerometers were not turned on in time to measure the impulse. And so no engine shutdown command could be sent. Seradata

Reference:

track id:

international: 2023-118 

Norad: 57600, 57601

Next missions:

From Yuri Borisov of Roscosmos,

Luna 25 by 11 Aug 2023

Luna 26 +4 years 

Luna 27 + 5 years

Luna 28 + 7 years

crewed mission + ? Years?


Reference:

Bilibili 

everydayastronaut

eseuro

habr

gazeta

pikabu

IKI

hindutimes

nasaspaceflight 

Wikarekare

SPACE
PILOT-D 

novosti-kosmo forum 
DISS , Современным самолетам ориентироваться в пространстве помогает ДИСС, from Radio Electronic Complex 

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

越南香草

Ngo ~ "N-gaw" Mui ~ "Moo-ee" Ngo ~ "N-gaw" Mui ~ "Moo-ee" Ngo ~ "N-gaw" Mui ~ "Moo-ee" Ngo (N-gaw) ,  Mui  (Moo-ee )  Cilantro Ngo Gai (N-gaw guy), Mui Tau (Moo-ee Tao), Ngo Tau (N-gaw Tao)   Mexican Coriander,  Sawtooth Coriander, Culantro    娥女帝(拼音), 刺芹   特徵:娥女帝是短株形的植物,氣味清淡,葉邊呈鋸齒形,十分容易辨認。來源地:越南。 功效:和白夏差不多,娥女帝亦有祛濕、解毒及驅風的療效。建議食法: Pho,  (Bánh Xeò) 越南煎餅, 炒菜,湯,咖哩 Ngo Gai ~ "N-gaw guy" Mui Tau ~ "Moo-ee Tao" Ngo Tau ~ "N-gaw Tao" - See more at: http://vietworldkitchen.typepad.com/blog/vietnamese-herb-primer.html#sthash.I9rzkzwI.dpuf Rau Ram (Rau Rahm) Vietnam Coriander, Laksa Leaf, "Vietnamese mint(actually not a mint)" Peppery, quite spicy. In salad Hung (Hoong), , Hung Lang (Hoong Lang) Spearmint.  Vietnamese coriander Hung Lui (Hoong Lou-ee), Hung Diu(Hoong Zee-ew) round mint used in salad Hung Cay (Hoong Kay) Mint Rau Que, Hung Que (H

copycat comandante C40 grinder

 from facebook 尋日朋友話係強國網上買左支C40,重要係斑馬木,話要拎嚟同我炫耀下,咁咪拎過嚟我到開箱囉。   斑馬木都停產左好耐,重要買到全新,重要係強國網,佢話買左二千四人仔,我當然半信半疑,見到面拎上手都好重手下,紙盒都算幾真,都幾結實,印刷都唔覺有太大問題,打開盒先開始覺得唔對路(圖1-14開箱圖)。 -1號圖,招紙貼得有d皺,但印刷都算幾清晰。 -2、3號圖,打開就爛左。 -4、5號圖,玻璃樽色澤、材質明顯有問題。 -7同9號係片,一定要聽下啲聲,好怪。 -8號圖,可以睇到冚蓋後,好大條罅。 -10號圖睇到,9號條片扭左幾下,不停有碎跌出黎。 -11號圖,拎出黎就花曬。 -12、13號圖,本身印刷品質數都高,但對番正版個張唔會有黑色油墨跡。 -14號圖,主體Logo係焫落去,有凹凸感,之後用正版對比,先發現問題。  立刻拎支正版出黎比對下。 -15-19號圖,如果無正版盒係手,就咁拎住個假盒都可能呃到下人,但真盒一拎上手,非常硬正,敲落去感覺好唔同。     -20-25號圖,基本重量無太大分別,假貨手柄比較重,正版高度比較多一點點。 -26-30號圖,透明、茶色粉杯一比之下就睇得出分別,正版比較通透、清晰,玻璃瓶品質高。 -31-33號圖,手柄膠片位有花、有明顯水口位,正版無水口,好平滑,木柄和連接轉軸位置都有所不同。 -34號片,正版磁力強,手柄好穩陣,假貨倒轉就跌出嚟,連磁石都甩埋(35號圖)。 -36-37號圖,歸零後正版手柄會卡住,假貨由於磁石位置甩咗,所以鎖唔住。 -38-39號圖,塑膠位置標誌以及文字正版都比較突顯、清晰。 -40號圖,未用內膽就有多處刮花。 -41-44號圖,驟眼睇真係好似,螺絲都跟都幾足,但網上搵左好多圖睇過,基本上文字同刀邊都會有距離,假野比較貼。 -45號圖,刀頭格數卡位用嘅孔,開箱個時扭左幾下已經有碎屑跌出嚟,放大睇更明顯睇到分別,正版手工好好,假野好似月球坑咁。 -46-47號圖,46正版歸零後好平,47扭到好盡,歸零唔順暢,有少許凸起。   -48號片,調節格數聲音,都唔洗講,一聽就知大問題 -49-50號圖,假貨膠料位置明顯水口,螺絲也有分別。 -51-52號圖,正版刀頭用左成年都好新,假貨扭左半日都無,就刮左個圈出黎蝕曬,鋼水差。   -53-56號圖,木面Logo雖然都做到好真,但都搵到分別

劣質洗衣機入水喉

上面白色是最易找到,$2x. 但漏水. 灰色, $4x, 是假冒 "MADE IN ITALY"  假冒 "MADE IN ITALY"  的標緻  左面是白色膠喉的喉頭, 右面是灰色膠喉的喉頭, 上圖左面是真正 好貨 ( MADE IN ITALY )灰色膠蓋.右面是冒牌 白色膠蓋. 膠蓋在安裝扭緊時爆開  上圖左面是真正 好貨 , 標了其他規格.右面是冒牌, 單單印了 MADE IN ITALY  好貨的膠蓋是可以下移, 露出喉頭及黑色軟膠墊 黑色軟膠墊是有坑紋. 質感較柔軟. 緊後可以"迫實"水龍頭 及喉蓋, 沒有滲漏 正板 MADE IN ITALY 賣 $4x, 價錢絕對合理. 冒牌貨在旺角新填地街買的, 也是$4x. 真是要小心!!! NB: MADE IN ITALY 是否真正 意大利制造實在無從考 証